Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-16281][Table SQL / Ecosystem] parameter 'maxRetryTimes' can not work in JDBCUpsertTableSink. #11223

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 3, 2020

Conversation

leonardBang
Copy link
Contributor

parameter 'maxRetryTimes' can not work in JDBCUpsertTableSink.

What is the purpose of the change

This pull request fix 'maxRetryTimes' can not work properly in JDBCUpsertTableSink( only AppendOnlyWriter) .

Brief change log

  • Cache data in AppendOnlyWriter for multiple call
  • Update executeBatch() in AppendOnlyWriter

Verifying this change

Test exception will be thrown normally in JDBCUpsertTableSinkITCase.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): ( no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 64692a3 (Wed Feb 26 13:43:12 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Feb 26, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Member

@libenchao libenchao left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@leonardBang Thanks for your contribution. The pr generally looks good to me, I only left some minor comments.

@libenchao
Copy link
Member

LGTM, +1 for merging.

Copy link
Contributor

@JingsongLi JingsongLi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @leonardBang , left some comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@JingsongLi JingsongLi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating, left some minor comments.

Copy link
Contributor

@JingsongLi JingsongLi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for updating, +1.
Merging...

@JingsongLi
Copy link
Contributor

I'll update title to [FLINK-16281][jdbc] Parameter 'maxRetryTimes' can not work in AppendOnlyWriter. FYI

@JingsongLi JingsongLi merged commit 3e10f0a into apache:master Mar 3, 2020
leonardBang added a commit to leonardBang/flink that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants