Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-18130][hive][fs-connector] File name conflict for different jobs in filesystem/hive sink #12485

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 9, 2020

Conversation

JingsongLi
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

The sink of different jobs (or the same SQL runs multiple times) will produce the same file name, the rename will fail, and different file systems will produce different results:

  • HadoopFileSystem: ignore new data.
  • LocalFileSystem: overwrite old data.

Brief change log

We can add UUID to prefix, make sure there is no conflict between jobs.

Verifying this change

  • HiveTableSinkITCase.testBatchAppend
  • HiveTableSinkITCase.testStreamingAppend
  • FileSystemITCaseBase.testInsertAppend
  • FileSystemITCaseBase.testInsertOverwrite

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jun 4, 2020

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 7fe7332 (Thu Jun 04 13:07:13 UTC 2020)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jun 4, 2020

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run travis re-run the last Travis build
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@JingsongLi
Copy link
Contributor Author

CC: @gaoyunhaii @lirui-apache

Copy link
Contributor

@gaoyunhaii gaoyunhaii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @JingsongLi , I reviewed the usage of OutputFileConfig in FileSystemTableSink and HiveTableSink, and I think it is OK from my side.

destPath = new Path(destDir, name);
count++;
}
fs.rename(srcPath, destPath);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here seems inconsistent with this method's comment: rename does not delete the dest path if it exists on HDFS. Instead, it will keep the srcPath and dest Path unchanged.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment is out of date, the overwrite is occurred in overwrite(Path) method instead of here.
Now it is consistent with HadoopRecoverableFsDataOutputStream.commit.
I will update comments.

@JingsongLi
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @gaoyunhaii for review, merging...

@JingsongLi JingsongLi merged commit 603cd83 into apache:master Jun 9, 2020
JingsongLi added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 9, 2020
zhangjun0x01 pushed a commit to zhangjun0x01/flink that referenced this pull request Jul 8, 2020
@JingsongLi JingsongLi deleted the filename branch November 5, 2020 09:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants