Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-3763] RabbitMQ Source/Sink standardize connection parameters #2054

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

subhankarb
Copy link
Contributor

@subhankarb subhankarb commented May 31, 2016

Thanks for contributing to Apache Flink. Before you open your pull request, please take the following check list into consideration.
If your changes take all of the items into account, feel free to open your pull request. For more information and/or questions please refer to the How To Contribute guide.
In addition to going through the list, please provide a meaningful description of your changes.

  • General
    • The pull request references the related JIRA issue ("[FLINK-XXX] Jira title text")
    • The pull request addresses only one issue
    • Each commit in the PR has a meaningful commit message (including the JIRA id)
  • Documentation
    • Documentation has been added for new functionality
    • Old documentation affected by the pull request has been updated
    • JavaDoc for public methods has been added
  • Tests & Build
    • Functionality added by the pull request is covered by tests
    • mvn clean verify has been executed successfully locally or a Travis build has passed

@rmetzger plz review.


package org.apache.flink.streaming.connectors.rabbitmq.common;

import com.google.common.base.Preconditions;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you use Flink's own Preconditions class in org.apache.flink.util?
We are trying to get rid of guava in the long run.

@rmetzger
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your contribution.
There are still some open issues that need addressing before we can merge this.

@subhankarb
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @rmetzger ,
would you plzzz review the changes.

@rmetzger
Copy link
Contributor

rmetzger commented Jun 9, 2016

Okay, I reviewed your pull request and I like it ;)
I'll merge your pull request together with some general RMQ cleanups: rmetzger@0a60c02

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants