Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-32850][flink-runtime][JUnit5 Migration] The io.disk package of flink-runtime module #23572

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 26, 2023

Conversation

Jiabao-Sun
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

[FLINK-32850][flink-runtime][JUnit5 Migration] The io.disk package of flink-runtime module

Brief change log

[FLINK-32850][flink-runtime][JUnit5 Migration] The io.disk package of flink-runtime module

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? not applicable

@Jiabao-Sun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @XComp, @1996fanrui, @RocMarshal.
Could you help review this PR when you have time?
Many thanks for that.

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Oct 23, 2023

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@Jiabao-Sun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @RocMarshal, please help review it when you have time.
Thanks :)

Copy link
Contributor

@RocMarshal RocMarshal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, @Jiabao-Sun Thanks for your hard work.
LGTM on the whole.
Only left a comment.
PTAL in your free time.


import java.io.EOFException;
import java.util.List;

import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThatThrownBy;
import static org.assertj.core.api.AssertionsForClassTypes.assertThat;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shoud the line be repalced by import static org.assertj.core.api.Assertions.assertThat ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @RocMarshal for the hard review.
Fixed.

Copy link
Contributor

@RocMarshal RocMarshal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Jiabao-Sun Thanks for the update.
LGTM +1 (non-binding)

@Jiabao-Sun
Copy link
Contributor Author

@1996fanrui, please help review it when you have time.
Many thanks for that.

Copy link
Member

@1996fanrui 1996fanrui left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @Jiabao-Sun for your effort, and @RocMarshal for your review!

@1996fanrui 1996fanrui merged commit 0ccd95e into apache:master Oct 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants