Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft [FLINK-28048] #23665

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

Draft [FLINK-28048] #23665

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

afedulov
Copy link
Contributor

@afedulov afedulov commented Nov 5, 2023

What is the purpose of the change

(For example: This pull request makes task deployment go through the blob server, rather than through RPC. That way we avoid re-transferring them on each deployment (during recovery).)

Brief change log

(for example:)

  • The TaskInfo is stored in the blob store on job creation time as a persistent artifact
  • Deployments RPC transmits only the blob storage reference
  • TaskManagers retrieve the TaskInfo from the blob cache

Verifying this change

Please make sure both new and modified tests in this PR follows the conventions defined in our code quality guide: https://flink.apache.org/contributing/code-style-and-quality-common.html#testing

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (100MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after master (JobManager) failure
  • Added test that validates that TaskInfo is transferred only once across recoveries
  • Manually verified the change by running a 4 node cluster with 2 JobManagers and 4 TaskManagers, a stateful streaming program, and killing one JobManager and two TaskManagers during the execution, verifying that recovery happens correctly.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Nov 5, 2023

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@afedulov afedulov force-pushed the 28048-finite branch 5 times, most recently from 5b253b3 to 2884e81 Compare November 8, 2023 17:56
@afedulov afedulov force-pushed the 28048-finite branch 2 times, most recently from 6ac8c04 to 49d4b73 Compare November 21, 2023 21:32
@afedulov afedulov changed the title Draft [FLINK-28048] (CI) Draft [FLINK-28048] Introduce Source API alternative to FiniteTestSource Nov 21, 2023
@afedulov afedulov changed the title Draft [FLINK-28048] Introduce Source API alternative to FiniteTestSource Draft [FLINK-28048][tests] Introduce Source API alternative to FiniteTestSource Nov 21, 2023
@afedulov afedulov changed the title Draft [FLINK-28048][tests] Introduce Source API alternative to FiniteTestSource Draft [FLINK-28048] Nov 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants