[FLINK-10569] Remove Instance usage in ExecutionVertexCancelTest

[tisonkun]

What is the purpose of the change

This pr is based on #7719 for the convenient constructor. The last commit is the diff.

Port CancelSequenceActorGateway to CancelSequenceSimpleAckingTaskManagerGateway and replace Instance->SimpleSlot with TestingLogicalSlot(TaskManagerGateway)

Verifying this change

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

• Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
• The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
• The serializers: (no)
• The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
• Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
• The S3 file system connector:(no)

Documentation

• Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
• If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

cc @tillrohrmann @zentol

[flinkbot]

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

• ❌ 1. The [description] looks good.
• ❌ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
• ❔ 3. Needs [attention] from.
• ❌ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
• ❌ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.

Bot commands

The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

• @flinkbot approve description to approve the 1st aspect (similarly, it also supports the consensus, architecture and quality keywords)
• @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
• @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
• @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval

[zentol]

@flinkbot approve all

1 comment, looks good otherwise.