Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-12076] [table-planner-blink] Add support for generating optimized logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch #8092

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Apr 2, 2019

Conversation

godfreyhe
Copy link
Contributor

@godfreyhe godfreyhe commented Apr 1, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

Add support for generating optimized logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch

Brief change log

  • add BatchExecHashAggRule to convert logical aggregate to BatchExecHashAggregate
  • add BatchExecSortAggRule to convert logical aggregate to BatchExecSortAggregate

Verifying this change

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

  • Added HashAggregateTest for BatchExecHashAggregate
  • Added SortAggregateTest for BatchExecSortAggregate

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Apr 1, 2019

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@godfreyhe godfreyhe changed the title [FLINK-12076] [table-planner-blink] Add support for generating optimized logical plan for batch simple group aggregate [FLINK-12076] [table-planner-blink] Add support for generating optimized logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch Apr 1, 2019

protected def isAggBufferFixedLength(aggBufferTypes: Array[Array[InternalType]]): Boolean = {
val aggBuffAttributesTypes = aggBufferTypes.flatten
val isAggBufferFixedLength = aggBuffAttributesTypes.forall(BinaryRow.isMutable)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add a TODO to check Decimal can be applied to hash agg, like sum(decimal)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have added test case to verify Decimal type in AggregateTestBase#testSum

* @param agg aggregate
* @return returns AUXILIARY_GROUP aggCalls' args and other aggCalls
*/
def checkAndSplitAggCalls(agg: Aggregate): (Array[Int], Seq[AggregateCall]) = {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

put this into AggregateUtil?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@KurtYoung
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM, +1

@KurtYoung KurtYoung merged commit 7375d70 into apache:master Apr 2, 2019
KurtYoung added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 2, 2019
…g optimized logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch (#8092)"

This reverts commit 7375d70.
@godfreyhe godfreyhe deleted the FLINK-12076 branch April 11, 2019 07:22
HuangZhenQiu pushed a commit to HuangZhenQiu/flink that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2019
…zed logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch (apache#8092)

* [FLINK-12076] [table-planner-blink] Add support for generating optimized logical plan for batch simple group aggregate

* fix checkstyle error

* remove Ignore from SingleRowJoinTest, and update based on comments

* fix checkstyle error
sunhaibotb pushed a commit to sunhaibotb/flink that referenced this pull request May 8, 2019
…zed logical plan for simple group aggregate on batch (apache#8092)

* [FLINK-12076] [table-planner-blink] Add support for generating optimized logical plan for batch simple group aggregate

* fix checkstyle error

* remove Ignore from SingleRowJoinTest, and update based on comments

* fix checkstyle error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants