Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-13427][hive] HiveCatalog's createFunction fails when function … #9254

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

lirui-apache
Copy link
Contributor

…name has upper-case characters

What is the purpose of the change

To fix the issue that function name is not normalized in HiveCatalog.

Brief change log

  • Normalize function name when a Hive function is created.
  • Added a common base class for HiveCatalogHiveMetadataTest and HiveCatalogGenericMetadataTest. And a new test case to make sure HiveCatalog is case-insensitive when creating a function.

Verifying this change

New test case added.

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): no
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): no
  • The serializers: no
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): no
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: no
  • The S3 file system connector: no

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? no
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? NA

@lirui-apache
Copy link
Contributor Author

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jul 29, 2019

CI report:

Copy link
Contributor

@xuefuz xuefuz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1.

The CI failures seem unrelated to changes made here.

@lirui-apache
Copy link
Contributor Author

The latest CI succeeded.
@wuchong would you mind help review and merge this PR? Thanks.

Copy link
Member

@wuchong wuchong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Will merge this.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 36fdbef Aug 2, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 2, 2019
@lirui-apache lirui-apache deleted the FLINK-13427 branch August 2, 2019 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
5 participants