Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-13562] [table-planner-blink] fix incorrect input type for local stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval #9346

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

godfreyhe
Copy link
Contributor

@godfreyhe godfreyhe commented Aug 3, 2019

What is the purpose of the change

fix incorrect input type for local stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval

Brief change log

  • fix incorrect input type for local stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval

Verifying this change

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

  • add new tests to verify the bug

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (yes / no)
  • The serializers: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (yes / no / don't know)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Yarn/Mesos, ZooKeeper: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The S3 file system connector: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Aug 3, 2019

Thanks a lot for your contribution to the Apache Flink project. I'm the @flinkbot. I help the community
to review your pull request. We will use this comment to track the progress of the review.

Automated Checks

Last check on commit 2095dae (Fri Aug 23 10:16:01 UTC 2019)

Warnings:

  • No documentation files were touched! Remember to keep the Flink docs up to date!

Mention the bot in a comment to re-run the automated checks.

Review Progress

  • ❓ 1. The [description] looks good.
  • ❓ 2. There is [consensus] that the contribution should go into to Flink.
  • ❓ 3. Needs [attention] from.
  • ❓ 4. The change fits into the overall [architecture].
  • ❓ 5. Overall code [quality] is good.

Please see the Pull Request Review Guide for a full explanation of the review process.


The Bot is tracking the review progress through labels. Labels are applied according to the order of the review items. For consensus, approval by a Flink committer of PMC member is required Bot commands
The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:

  • @flinkbot approve description to approve one or more aspects (aspects: description, consensus, architecture and quality)
  • @flinkbot approve all to approve all aspects
  • @flinkbot approve-until architecture to approve everything until architecture
  • @flinkbot attention @username1 [@username2 ..] to require somebody's attention
  • @flinkbot disapprove architecture to remove an approval you gave earlier

@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Aug 3, 2019

CI report:

@@ -117,6 +117,11 @@ class DistinctAggregateTest(
util.verifyPlan(sqlQuery)
}

@Test
def testTwoDistinctAggregateWithNonDistinctAgg(): Unit = {
util.verifyPlan("SELECT c, SUM(DISTINCT a), SUM(a), COUNT(DISTINCT b) FROM MyTable GROUP BY c")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's purpose of this test? Will it fail without the fix?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, to verify the bug

Copy link
Member

@wuchong wuchong left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Could you rebase master to trigger the travis again ? I just merged the explain term PR.

…l stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval
wuchong pushed a commit to wuchong/flink that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2019
… stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval

This closes apache#9346
@wuchong
Copy link
Member

wuchong commented Aug 9, 2019

Waiting for travis passing: https://travis-ci.org/wuchong/flink/builds/569693450

@godfreyhe
Copy link
Contributor Author

LGTM.

Could you rebase master to trigger the travis again ? I just merged the explain term PR.

rebased

@wuchong
Copy link
Member

wuchong commented Aug 12, 2019

Merging

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 0b65aea Aug 12, 2019
asfgit pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 12, 2019
… stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval

This closes #9346
becketqin pushed a commit to becketqin/flink that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2019
… stream group aggregate in FlinkRelMdColumnInterval

This closes apache#9346
@godfreyhe godfreyhe deleted the FLINK-13562 branch May 20, 2020 02:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
4 participants