Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GEODE-4439 Refactor HandShake.java #1374

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

bschuchardt
Copy link
Contributor

@bschuchardt bschuchardt commented Feb 1, 2018

Created ServerSideHandshake and ServerSideHandshakeImpl for servers.

Created ClientSideHandshake and ClientSideHandshakeImpl for clients.

Message encryption/decryption is now in an Encryptor interface.
-- opened a new ticket to track that client/server diffie-hellman handshake has been broken since 2008

HandShake is renamed Handshake.

@PivotalSarge @WireBaron @upthewaterspout @galen-pivotal

Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Geode.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically develop)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?

  • Does gradlew build run cleanly?

  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?

  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and
submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. If you need help, please send an
email to dev@geode.apache.org.

Created ServerSideHandshake and ServerSideHandshakeImpl for servers.

Created ClientSideHandshake and ClientSideHandshakeImpl for clients.

Message encryption/decryption is now in an Encryptor interface.

HandShake is renamed Handshake.
Copy link
Contributor

@PivotalSarge PivotalSarge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The refactor looks fine to me.

import org.apache.geode.security.Authenticator;
import org.apache.geode.security.GemFireSecurityException;

public abstract class Handshake {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice rename.

Copy link
Contributor

@PivotalSarge PivotalSarge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have very little experience with the handshake stuff but it looks like a good refactoring to me.

Copy link

@WireBaron WireBaron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, though the review was little large to go through that carefully. It may have been easier to review if you had the HandShake->Handshake rename in a separate commit.

protected HandShake getHandShake() {
return handShake;
protected byte[] encryptBytes(byte[] messageBytes) throws Exception {
return handshake.getEncryptor().encryptBytes(messageBytes);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there any risk of handshake not being set when this (or decryptBytes) is called?

}
}


Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks like there are several places in this file that have a few extra newlines.

@bschuchardt
Copy link
Contributor Author

commit c1b21c0 (HEAD -> develop, origin/develop)
Author: Bruce Schuchardt bschuchardt@pivotal.io
Date: Fri Feb 2 13:07:38 2018 -0800

@bschuchardt bschuchardt closed this Feb 2, 2018
@bschuchardt bschuchardt deleted the feature/GEODE-4439-squashed branch August 10, 2018 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants