New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GEODE-3539: Add missing test coverage for 'describe connection' command. #797
GEODE-3539: Add missing test coverage for 'describe connection' command. #797
Conversation
New test failed in precheckin failed due to IPv4 vs IPv6 discrepancy. Correction pending. |
98e3bbf
to
521a93c
Compare
Enumeration<NetworkInterface> networkInterfaces = NetworkInterface.getNetworkInterfaces(); | ||
NetworkInterface myInterface = networkInterfaces.nextElement(); | ||
Enumeration<InetAddress> myAddresses = myInterface.getInetAddresses(); | ||
return StreamSupport |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Since this Enumeration will be reliably bounded (finite), I think we can turn it into a stream more concisely:
Collections.list(myAddresses).stream()
.map(InetAddress::getHostAddress)
.map(address -> formatAddressAndPort(address, locator.getJmxPort())).toArray(String[]::new);
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's much less cudgel-y! Thanks.
} | ||
} | ||
failWithMessage("No accepted value found."); | ||
return null; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think you can still return this
rather than returning null
. (For instance, someone might be using a JUnit rule that gathers up exceptions and re-throws them at the end of a sequence of operations. We wouldn't want to give them a NPE here in that case.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hadn't even considered that scenario. Done and done.
Looks good overall! |
5dcd783
to
24c7c1f
Compare
Precheckin running.
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache Geode.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:
For all changes:
Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced in the commit message?
Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically
develop
)?Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
Does
gradlew build
run cleanly?Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and
submit an update to your PR as soon as possible. If you need help, please send an
email to dev@geode.apache.org.