[Improvement] Refactor the table implementation in spark-connector #2845
Labels
improvement
Improvements on everything
Comments
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
caican00
added a commit
to caican00/gravitino
that referenced
this issue
Apr 9, 2024
…entation in spark-connector
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
What would you like to be improved?
Refactor the table implementation in spark-connector.
The purpose of inheritance
SparkTableis in order to go through theisIcebergTablecheck inIcebergSparkSqlExtensionsParser.For details, please refer to: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/blob/main/spark/v3.4/spark-extensions/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/extensions/IcebergSparkSqlExtensionsParser.scala#L127-L186
Without refactoring, row-level operations cannot be performed.
How should we improve?
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: