Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

GROOVY-7996: check for get(String)/set(String,Object) or propertyMissing #1051

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2019
Merged

GROOVY-7996: check for get(String)/set(String,Object) or propertyMissing #1051

merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2019

Conversation

eric-milles
Copy link
Member

@eric-milles eric-milles commented Oct 29, 2019 •
edited

Here is another take on GROOVY-7996. Closure delegate implements propertyMissing and owner has field. Submitter expects propertyMissing to be respected since resolve strategy is DELEGATE_FIRST.

@eric-milles eric-milles marked this pull request as ready for review November 5, 2019 22:56
@daniellansun daniellansun merged commit 8b0e5b7 into master Nov 9, 2019
@daniellansun
Copy link
Contributor

Merged. Thanks.

@asfgit asfgit deleted the GROOVY-7996 branch November 14, 2019 16:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
2 participants
@eric-milles @daniellansun