HIVE-26490: Iceberg: Residual expression is constructed for the task … #3574
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…from multiple places causing CPU burn
kgyrtkirk
added
tests pending
tests unstable
and removed
tests pending
tests unstable
labels
|
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!
|
szlta
approved these changes
Sep 9, 2022
DongWei-4
pushed a commit
to DongWei-4/hive
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 28, 2022
…from multiple places causing CPU burn (apache#3574)
dengzhhu653
pushed a commit
to dengzhhu653/hive
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2022
…from multiple places causing CPU burn (apache#3574)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
HIVE-26490: Iceberg: Residual expression is constructed for the task from multiple places causing CPU burn
Residual expression was evaluated multiple times in reader codepath causing CPU burn.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No
How was this patch tested?
Small internal cluster