Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request]: Static Schema Definition #3657

Closed
sramazzina opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3658
Closed

[Feature Request]: Static Schema Definition #3657

sramazzina opened this issue Feb 21, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #3658
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@sramazzina
Copy link
Contributor

What would you like to happen?

The purpose of the static schema is to provide a static way to provide tabular layouts to input and output transforms in an Apache Hop pipeline.

Static schemas should:

  • Exist per project/customer
  • Initially apply to a selected set of input and output transforms (CSV FIle Input, Excel Input, Microsoft Excel Writer, Text file input, Text file output)

Transforms that use a static schema will incorporate the schema definition in the transform’s metadata (embedded in the pipeline’s XML serialization). Also, a new transform called “Schema Mapping” will allow an Apache Hop pipeline developer to map a pipeline stream to a static schema layout.

Issue Priority

Priority: 3

Issue Component

Component: Transforms

@usbrandon
Copy link
Contributor

Very interesting. What kind of problem is being solved here?

hansva added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2024
@hansva hansva added this to the 2.9 milestone Mar 5, 2024
@hansva
Copy link
Contributor

hansva commented Mar 5, 2024

It's the first step to catalog integration, let's say you require a specific schema for your output CSV files you can define them and map your stream to match this definition

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants