Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[HUDI-6421] Claim RFC-70 for Hudi Reverse Streamer #9040

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2023

Conversation

pratyakshsharma
Copy link
Contributor

@pratyakshsharma pratyakshsharma commented Jun 22, 2023

Change Logs

Epic link -
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-6425

Impact

none

Risk level (write none, low medium or high below)

none

Documentation Update

As above

Contributor's checklist

  • Read through contributor's guide
  • Change Logs and Impact were stated clearly
  • Adequate tests were added if applicable
  • CI passed

@pratyakshsharma pratyakshsharma changed the title Claim RFC-70 for Hudi Reverse Streamer [HUDI-6421]: Claim RFC-70 for Hudi Reverse Streamer Jun 22, 2023
Copy link
Member

@codope codope left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please create a JIRA epic and link it here?

@hudi-bot
Copy link

CI report:

Bot commands @hudi-bot supports the following commands:
  • @hudi-bot run azure re-run the last Azure build

@yihua
Copy link
Contributor

yihua commented Jun 22, 2023

Hey @pratyakshsharma let's stick to the PR description template; otherwise, the PR validation action fails. I've updated the description for you.

@yihua yihua added the rfc label Jun 22, 2023
@yihua yihua changed the title [HUDI-6421]: Claim RFC-70 for Hudi Reverse Streamer [HUDI-6421] Claim RFC-70 for Hudi Reverse Streamer Jun 22, 2023
@yihua yihua merged commit b65556b into apache:master Jun 22, 2023
3 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants