Docs: Update Partitions table in Flink/Spark doc #8021
Conversation
docs/spark-queries.md
Outdated
|
|
||
| Note: | ||
| 1. For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will contain only the record_count and file_count columns. | ||
| 1. For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will not contain partition and spec_id field. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Sorry another nit, field should be plural:
- For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will not contain the partition and spec_id fields.
|
|
||
| Note: | ||
| For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will contain only the record_count and file_count columns. | ||
| For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will not contain the partition and spec_id fields. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
nit, i just noticed original word is columns but we updated to use fields here. do you think fields are better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hmm.. dont have a strong opinion, I guess they are both equivalent, or do you see a difference?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah you are right, looking at spec and they are used interchangeably
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@dramaticlly Thanks for your feedback:)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @hsiang-c , this include doc update for many improvements we did on partitions table!
|
|
||
| Note: | ||
| For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will contain only the record_count and file_count columns. | ||
| For unpartitioned tables, the partitions table will not contain the partition and spec_id fields. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
yeah you are right, looking at spec and they are used interchangeably
|
Merged, thanks @hsiang-c , and @dramaticlly for extra review! |
Note