Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Core: Enable column statistics filtering after planning #8803
Core: Enable column statistics filtering after planning #8803
Changes from 9 commits
5bb425d
7a3effa
ae5975c
be9a11e
c8061f3
d0fcac2
9872f1f
f6279d0
32d2645
1922ae0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While I think it should be fine, here is an idea. Java comes with
serialver
utility that allows us to generate the version UID prior to the change in this PR. We can use that value instead of1L
to be fully compatible. We don't modify the serialization of this class, we just missed to assignserialVersionUID
. If we can recover the default value, we shouldn't worry about compatibility.Here is the value I got locally:
Could you double check, @pvary? If not, we can keep it as is.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Checked, but even when setting the
serialVersionUID
to-3377238354349859240L
we have a revapi failure.Also double checked, but
serialver
generated the same id for the old and the new code on my mac.Do resorted to the revapi change.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I am not sure what revapi actually does. I doubt they compare actual values. I think we should be fine.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You may consider overloading the constructor so that you don't have to pass an extra null here or adding the comment for the second argument (we have a comment for
true
but notnull
).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this usage is straightforward, and adding a new constructor would not help too much.
So I did not apply this change