Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IGNITE-9719 Extra rebalanceThreadPoolSize check on client node #4911

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

IGNITE-9719 Extra rebalanceThreadPoolSize check on client node #4911

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

luchnikovbsk
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

try (
Ignite si = Ignition.start(Config.getServerConfiguration());
Ignite ci = Ignition.start(cci);) {
Set<ClusterNode> collect = si.cluster().nodes().stream().filter(new Predicate<ClusterNode>() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

plz format this correctly

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

done

@asfgit asfgit closed this in 962d6a2 Oct 23, 2018
zstan pushed a commit to gridgain/apache-ignite that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
…apache#4911.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Rakov <irakov@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 962d6a2)
zstan pushed a commit to gridgain/apache-ignite that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
…apache#4911.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Rakov <irakov@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 962d6a2)
zstan pushed a commit to gridgain/apache-ignite that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2018
…apache#4911.

Signed-off-by: Ivan Rakov <irakov@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 962d6a2)
akalash pushed a commit to gridgain/apache-ignite that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants