This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 20, 2022. It is now read-only.
[HIVEMALL-36] Refactor each_top_k #27
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@maropu LGTM. Please merge this PR and close the JIRA ticket. BTW, |
|
okay, I'll merge this, then I'll check the OOM issue in follow-up activities. Thanks! |
1 similar comment
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr fixed wrongly-handling code for logical plans in
each_top_k.Also, it removed the interface
def each_top_k(k: Int, group: String, score: String, args: String*)foreach_top_kbecause I think the other interface is more natural as Spark APIs.What type of PR is it?
Refactoring
What is the Jira issue?
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVEMALL-36