Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 4, 2022. It is now read-only.

[REEF-460]: Remove all generated files on mvn clean #293

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

taegeonum
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request addressed the issue by

  • Change test root folder to target/REEF_LOCAL_RUNTIME

JIRA: REEF-460

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jul 12, 2015

Reef-pull-request-windows2 #66 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jul 12, 2015

Reef-pull-request-ubuntu #72 FAILURE
Looks like there's a problem with this pull request

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@

@Inject
WorkingDirectoryTempFileCreator() throws IOException {
this.tempFolderAsFile = new File("./reef/temp");
this.tempFolderAsFile = new File("./target/reef/temp");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@markusweimer This change will affect temporary directories created in YARN, Mesos, and HDInsight as well as local test runs. Is this the behavior we want?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No, I don't think so. This is for temporary files created by the driver or evaluator. Those file should reside withing in ./reef/ hierarchy.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see. I will keep ./reef/temp.

This pull request addressed the issue by

* Change test root folder to `target/REEF_LOCAL_RUNTIME`

JIRA: [REEF-460](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/REEF-460)
@taegeonum
Copy link
Contributor Author

@markusweimer Could you please take a look? I've addressed your comments.

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jul 13, 2015

Reef-pull-request-ubuntu #74 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@asfbot
Copy link

asfbot commented Jul 13, 2015

Reef-pull-request-windows2 #68 SUCCESS
This pull request looks good

@markusweimer
Copy link
Contributor

I'll test and merge. This looks good.

@taegeonum taegeonum closed this Jul 13, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants