-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 11.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[ROCKETMQ-202] Using the native transport #106
Conversation
@shroman @Jaskey @dongeforever @zhouxinyu Guys, please review this minor improvement pull request. |
Is there any performance data when change to Epoll? |
@lindzh Checkout this lecture presented by author of Netty, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DKJ0w30M0vg |
@lizhanhui Looks good. Can we have some tests? |
@shroman What kind of tests, in you mind, should we have for this PR? Benchmark tests to profile performances between java NIO transport and native transport? |
@lizhanhui I was thinking about platform dependent tests, but performance profiling would be nice too. Sorry for being vague. |
…e transport library.
1 similar comment
1 similar comment
Associate with #195 @lizhanhui @shroman I close this pr, we could make a collaborative search for native AIO transport polish :-) |
[ISSUE #106] fix fastjson update version to 1.2.83
Since 4.0.16, Netty provides the native socket transport for Linux using JNI. This transport has higher performance and produces less garbage, so you might want to give it a try.
See Netty native transportation docs