bugfix: filter repeated lock

[zjinlei]

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fixes #1833

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

1.use @Transcation
2.batch write such as insert id (123),(124),(125)
3.update 123

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #1839 into develop will increase coverage by 0.11%.
The diff coverage is 50%.

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #1839      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      54.95%   55.06%   +0.11%     
- Complexity      2352     2354       +2     
=============================================
  Files            421      422       +1     
  Lines          14266    14271       +5     
  Branches        1682     1712      +30     
=============================================
+ Hits            7840     7859      +19     
- Misses          5681     5683       +2     
+ Partials         745      729      -16

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ	Complexity Δ
...rc/main/java/io/seata/common/util/LambdaUtils.java	0% <ø> (ø)	0 <0> (?)
...a/io/seata/core/store/db/LockStoreDataBaseDAO.java	52.87% <50%> (-0.04%)	20 <0> (ø)
...server/store/file/FileTransactionStoreManager.java	60.85% <0%> (+0.65%)	30% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
...ource/sql/struct/cache/AbstractTableMetaCache.java	91.17% <0%> (+2.94%)	11% <0%> (+1%)	⬆️
...rotobuf/convertor/RegisterTMResponseConvertor.java	84.84% <0%> (+3.03%)	3% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...rotobuf/convertor/RegisterRMResponseConvertor.java	84.84% <0%> (+3.03%)	3% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...otobuf/convertor/GlobalBeginResponseConvertor.java	96.96% <0%> (+3.03%)	3% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...obuf/convertor/BranchRollbackRequestConvertor.java	96.42% <0%> (+3.57%)	3% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
...otobuf/convertor/BranchCommitRequestConvertor.java	100% <0%> (+3.57%)	3% <0%> (ø)	⬇️
... and 8 more

[slievrly]

I recommend putting the duplicate lockkey in rm.

[slievrly]

@zjinlei How to move the distinct logic to DataBaseLocker#acquireLock? Avoid where in the sql statement is too long

[slievrly]

LGTM

[xingfudeshi]

LGTM.