-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bugfix: fix nested GlobalLock unbind prematurely #2698
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2698 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 50.50% 50.49% -0.02%
Complexity 2921 2921
=============================================
Files 572 572
Lines 18610 18613 +3
Branches 2240 2241 +1
=============================================
- Hits 9399 9398 -1
Misses 8285 8285
- Partials 926 930 +4
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
The problem has been solved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #2696
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Within an application service:
serviceA(@ GlobalLock + @ Transaction)->serviceB(@ GlobalLock + @ Transaction)
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews