Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bugfix: forbidden use order by or limit in multi sql #3241

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Dec 24, 2020

Conversation

caohdgege
Copy link
Contributor

@caohdgege caohdgege commented Oct 29, 2020

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

if multi sql contains order by or limit, throws NotSupportYetException to notic user

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Nov 1, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #3241 (3908125) into develop (ab01b84) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 60.00%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             develop    #3241      +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage      51.54%   51.56%   +0.01%     
- Complexity      3337     3341       +4     
=============================================
  Files            616      616              
  Lines          20233    20243      +10     
  Branches        2535     2541       +6     
=============================================
+ Hits           10430    10439       +9     
+ Misses          8753     8752       -1     
- Partials        1050     1052       +2     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
.../seata/rm/datasource/exec/MultiDeleteExecutor.java 91.42% <40.00%> (-8.58%) 10.00 <0.00> (+1.00) ⬇️
.../seata/rm/datasource/exec/MultiUpdateExecutor.java 76.25% <80.00%> (+0.25%) 14.00 <0.00> (+2.00)
...n/src/main/java/io/seata/common/util/IdWorker.java 83.33% <0.00%> (+6.25%) 12.00% <0.00%> (+1.00%)

@funky-eyes funky-eyes added this to the 1.5.0 milestone Nov 30, 2020
@funky-eyes funky-eyes added the module/rm-datasource rm-datasource module label Dec 1, 2020
Copy link
Member

@slievrly slievrly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@l81893521 l81893521 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@jsbxyyx jsbxyyx left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

@funky-eyes funky-eyes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@funky-eyes funky-eyes merged commit 08fbcef into apache:develop Dec 24, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
module/rm-datasource rm-datasource module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants