-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature: make seata-bom be the real Bill-Of-Material #3870
Conversation
There is two force-push for correcting the gpg sign issue, don't mind it. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #3870 +/- ##
=============================================
- Coverage 40.80% 40.79% -0.01%
Complexity 3057 3057
=============================================
Files 681 681
Lines 22872 22872
Branches 2839 2839
=============================================
- Hits 9333 9331 -2
- Misses 12669 12671 +2
Partials 870 870
|
The |
ok, I'll remove it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did
Add all deployable modules with "jar" packaging to seata-bom's
dependencyManagement
.All the users could import
seata-bom
to align the version of their seata dependencies.Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?
fixes #3761
Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?
Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it
Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews