optimize: optimize the default values for some switches

[slievrly]

• I have registered the PR changes.

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR did

optimize the default values for some switches

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Why don't you add test cases (unit test/integration test)?

Ⅳ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅴ. Special notes for reviews

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #5183 (c614708) into develop (512e605) will increase coverage by 0.00%.
The diff coverage is 57.14%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             develop    #5183   +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage      48.45%   48.45%           
- Complexity      4135     4136    +1     
==========================================
  Files            743      743           
  Lines          26517    26517           
  Branches        3294     3294           
==========================================
+ Hits           12848    12849    +1     
+ Misses         12273    12269    -4     
- Partials        1396     1399    +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...n/src/main/java/io/seata/common/DefaultValues.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...rpc/processor/server/ServerOnRequestProcessor.java	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
...eata/core/store/db/AbstractDataSourceProvider.java	0.00% <ø> (ø)
...seata/server/storage/redis/JedisPooledFactory.java	26.08% <0.00%> (ø)
...ure/properties/server/store/StoreDBProperties.java	28.07% <100.00%> (ø)
.../properties/server/store/StoreRedisProperties.java	31.81% <100.00%> (ø)
...rage/db/store/DataBaseTransactionStoreManager.java	60.71% <100.00%> (ø)
...rage/redis/store/RedisTransactionStoreManager.java	72.06% <100.00%> (ø)
.../java/io/seata/spring/util/TCCBeanParserUtils.java	30.64% <0.00%> (-1.62%)	⬇️
...erver/storage/file/session/FileSessionManager.java	47.77% <0.00%> (-0.64%)	⬇️
... and 3 more