Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[explore] Improved time filters controls #3371

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 28, 2017

Conversation

mistercrunch
Copy link
Member

img

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 25, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 69.314% when pulling 2f538c0 on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 25, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 69.314% when pulling 2401cb5 on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Aug 25, 2017

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.03%) to 69.287% when pulling 286aa63 on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@timifasubaa
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@@ -9,8 +9,9 @@
},
"scripts": {
"test": "mocha --require ignore-styles --compilers js:babel-core/register --require spec/helpers/browser.js --recursive spec/**/*_spec.*",
"cover": "babel-node node_modules/.bin/babel-istanbul cover _mocha -- --require spec/helpers/browser.js --recursive spec/**/*_spec.*",
"cover": "babel-node node_modules/.bin/babel-istanbul cover _mocha -- --require ignore-styles spec/helpers/browser.js --recursive spec/**/*_spec.*",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this necessary?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Started failing for some reason. Seem like it had to do with the way that react-datetime was importing CSS...

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 69.321% when pulling d67a57f on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

3 similar comments
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 69.321% when pulling d67a57f on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 69.321% when pulling d67a57f on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.007%) to 69.321% when pulling d67a57f on mistercrunch:date_control into 0c8b243 on apache:master.

@mistercrunch mistercrunch merged commit a47a512 into apache:master Aug 28, 2017
@mistercrunch mistercrunch deleted the date_control branch August 28, 2017 16:16
)

from_dttm = utils.parse_human_datetime(since)
now = datetime.now()
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

removing this created issues where some dashboards had expression like 180 days that would get flipped to be in the past

@mistercrunch mistercrunch added 🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.20.0 labels Feb 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏷️ bot A label used by `supersetbot` to keep track of which PR where auto-tagged with release labels 🚢 0.20.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants