Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[#477] feat(spark): Fix rss.resubmit.stage does not support dynamic client conf. #1050

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Jul 31, 2023

Conversation

leixm
Copy link
Contributor

@leixm leixm commented Jul 28, 2023

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fix rss.resubmit.stage does not support dynamic client conf.

Why are the changes needed?

For #477.

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No.

How was this patch tested?

UT.

@leixm
Copy link
Contributor Author

leixm commented Jul 28, 2023

cc @advancedxy PTAL.

@jerqi jerqi requested a review from advancedxy July 28, 2023 07:43
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #1050 (ade1243) into master (57c35ad) will increase coverage by 1.12%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1050      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     54.27%   55.40%   +1.12%     
  Complexity     2550     2550              
============================================
  Files           386      366      -20     
  Lines         21828    19501    -2327     
  Branches       1807     1813       +6     
============================================
- Hits          11848    10804    -1044     
+ Misses         9278     8068    -1210     
+ Partials        702      629      -73     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
.../java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/RssSparkConfig.java 98.70% <100.00%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

... and 24 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

advancedxy
advancedxy previously approved these changes Jul 29, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@advancedxy advancedxy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

Please check the UT failure of tez module

Copy link
Contributor

@jerqi jerqi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks all. Merged to master.

@jerqi jerqi merged commit 9ef3747 into apache:master Jul 31, 2023
30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants