-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[FOLLOWUP] Add the conf of rss.security.hadoop.krb5-conf.file #184
Conversation
Why isn't the test necessary? Should we add some documents? |
Yes. Security section doc is added. Test cases may be added tomorrow. |
There is a flaky test about Kerboros, if you have time, could you fix it? |
common/src/test/java/org/apache/uniffle/common/security/HadoopSecurityContextTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There is a another flaky test about kerberos.
|
This failure looks the problem of DNS. I'm trying fix |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #184 +/- ##
============================================
+ Coverage 58.37% 58.45% +0.07%
- Complexity 1270 1272 +2
============================================
Files 158 158
Lines 8428 8437 +9
Branches 782 782
============================================
+ Hits 4920 4932 +12
+ Misses 3255 3254 -1
+ Partials 253 251 -2
📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thanks @zuston
Thanks @jerqi Oh, the description should be changed to match more things involved in this PR. |
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add the conf of
rss.security.hadoop.krb5-conf.file
Why are the changes needed?
Follow up #53 , the krb5 conf file can be configured in
SecurityConfig
, and also should be configured in shuffle-server/coordinator conf for users.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
Yes
How was this patch tested?
Not necessary.