Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[IMPROVEMENT][COMMON] Fix common module code style #99

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 29, 2022

Conversation

jerqi
Copy link
Contributor

@jerqi jerqi commented Jul 29, 2022

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

To solve common module code style in pr Tencent/Firestorm#155

Why are the changes needed?

Improve our test code style

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

I add the test code style check commits, common module passed.
https://github.com/jerqi/incubator-uniffle/runs/7572429851?check_suite_focus=true

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Jul 29, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #99 (f6eaeef) into master (ccb39ed) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #99      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     56.33%   56.31%   -0.02%     
+ Complexity     1176     1175       -1     
============================================
  Files           149      149              
  Lines          7992     7992              
  Branches        766      766              
============================================
- Hits           4502     4501       -1     
  Misses         3246     3246              
- Partials        244      245       +1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../apache/uniffle/coordinator/ClientConfManager.java 91.54% <0.00%> (-1.41%) ⬇️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us.

@jerqi jerqi changed the title [Improvement] Fix common module code style [IMPROVEMENT][COMMON] Fix common module code style Jul 29, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants