Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[INLONG-1699][doc] add a correct interpretation for InLong #1700

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 21, 2021

Conversation

dockerzhang
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #1699

Motivation

Explain here the context, and why you're making that change. What is the problem you're trying to solve.

Modifications

Describe the modifications you've done.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
  • If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
  • If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

@dockerzhang dockerzhang changed the title [INLONG-1699] add a correct interpretation for InLong [INLONG-1699][doc] add a correct interpretation for InLong Oct 20, 2021
Copy link
Contributor

@gosonzhang gosonzhang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1

@gosonzhang gosonzhang merged commit 4d87648 into apache:master Oct 21, 2021
@aloyszhang aloyszhang added this to the 0.11.0 milestone Oct 22, 2021
@dockerzhang dockerzhang deleted the fix-1699 branch February 11, 2022 05:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Improve][doc] add a correct interpretation for InLong
3 participants