New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OAK-8646 : added metrics for unmergedbranch commits & improved junit coverage #1111
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1, let's merge this.
A few after the fact comments:
- I would have preferred to get OAK-8646 : Clean up changes from orphaned branch commits #1090 done before adding metrics on top. Reason is that the way it's done now breaks the git PR review process and makes it virtually impossible to properly address PR review comments therefore - besides making the review itself unnecessarily much harder.
- Different people might have different preferences when it comes to "stream type processing". As of now, some of the review comments in OAK-8646 : Clean up changes from orphaned branch commits #1090 have been piggybacked into the OAK-8646 : added metrics for unmergedbranch commits & improved junit coverage #1111 directly, without awaiting PR review comments. So from the current state we'd have to revert it first in this PR were we to revisit that aspect. For this reason I believe it's fine, let's merge this. But there might have been a possibility to discuss pros/cons or just revisit that aspect - which I believe with the OAK-8646 : Clean up changes from orphaned branch commits #1090 / OAK-8646 : added metrics for unmergedbranch commits & improved junit coverage #1111 mixup was made impossible. That would be another reason for preference of doing PRs sequentially, not combined.
But overall I think let's merge and then revisit the state in the feature branch if needed.
maybe we can try to fix that... |
76e1ee4
to
36f9ac6
Compare
Fixed in 88db3b0 |
Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed! 0 Bugs 86.5% Coverage The version of Java (11.0.20.1) you have used to run this analysis is deprecated and we will stop accepting it soon. Please update to at least Java 17. |
No description provided.