New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jena 1206 #149
Jena 1206 #149
Conversation
Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@fedict.be>
Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@fedict.be>
Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@fedict.be>
+1 : Looks good to me. |
Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@fedict.be>
Signed-off-by:Bart Hanssens <bart.hanssens@fedict.be>
I was assuming these vocabularies would be part of the main distribution and build. If so, the POM file is not needed (nor invoked). |
If we were starting from scratch, |
Ah OK, so should I go back to the original proposal (just adding the classes to ...vocabularies), or use a separate package (as suggested in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1206, e.g. "vocabularies.egov") ? Thanks. |
I don't have any strong feelings - I'm just following the current pattern (for better or worse). I doubt we will have name clashes (independent vocabs - not versions). The minor downside of classifying by package is implicit domain. DCAT will be hopefully used much more widely than eGov. |
Added W3C DCAT, VoID, ORG and ROV vocabularies