Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LUCENE-10452: Hunspell: call checkCanceled less frequently to reduce the overhead #723

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 16, 2022

Conversation

donnerpeter
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@donnerpeter donnerpeter requested a review from dweiss March 15, 2022 20:51
@donnerpeter donnerpeter merged commit af97c5e into apache:main Mar 16, 2022
@donnerpeter
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dweiss do you approve of a backport here? (with changes.txt entry)

@donnerpeter donnerpeter deleted the checkCanceled branch March 16, 2022 08:06
@dweiss
Copy link
Contributor

dweiss commented Mar 16, 2022

Yep, thanks.

donnerpeter added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2022
mogui pushed a commit to sourcesense/lucene that referenced this pull request Mar 21, 2022
* main:
  LUCENE-10473: Make tests a bit faster when running nightly. (apache#754)
  LUCENE-9905: Fix check in TestPerFieldKnnVectorsFormat#testMergeUsesNewFormat
  LUCENE-9614: Fix rare TestKnnVectorQuery failures
  LUCENE-10472: Fix TestMatchAllDocsQuery#testEarlyTermination (apache#753)
  LUCENE-10418: Move CHANGES to the correct section.
  LUCENE-10418: Optimize `Query#rewrite` in the non-scoring case. (apache#672)
  LUCENE-10469: Fix score mode propagation in ConstantScoreQuery. (apache#750)
  LUCENE-10452, LUCENE-10451: mention hunspell changes in CHANGES.txt
  LUCENE-10452: Hunspell: call checkCanceled less frequently to reduce the overhead (apache#723)
  Add 9.2.0 section to release notes
  LUCENE-10451 Hunspell: don't perform potentially expensive spellchecking after timeout (apache#721)
  LUCENE-10463: increment java version to 17 in smoke tester (apache#748)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants