Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[MRESOLVER-491] Resolver should not have any "predefined" scope #425

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

cstamas
Copy link
Member

@cstamas cstamas commented Feb 6, 2024

It is duty of consumer application to define those. Also, no need for SPI either, as essentialy ONLY the dependency managers were using the "system" scope definition so far.

Now, client code, that instantianates these anyway are able to pass in predicate.

Note: as util is japicmp checked, the def ctors MUST stay, but are deprecated.


https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-491

It is duty of consumer application to define those. Also,
no need for SPI either, as essentialy ONLY the dependency
managers were using the "system" scope definition so far.

Now, client code, that instantianates these anyway are
able to pass in predicate.

---

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MRESOLVER-491
@cstamas cstamas self-assigned this Feb 6, 2024
@cstamas cstamas marked this pull request as ready for review February 6, 2024 17:59
Copy link
Contributor

@gnodet gnodet left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've added a constant definition for the system predicate in tests, otherwise LGTM

@cstamas
Copy link
Member Author

cstamas commented Feb 7, 2024

@gnodet looks good

@cstamas cstamas merged commit dc3ceb4 into apache:master Feb 7, 2024
4 checks passed
@cstamas cstamas deleted the mresolver-491 branch February 7, 2024 09:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants