-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 90
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MINIFICPP-1043 - FetchOPC should support reporting changes only #672
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally looks good, a few issues are in inline comments.
Will test it with an OPC test server.
|
||
return std::string(charBuf.data(), charBuf.size()); | ||
return std::string(charBuf.data(), sz); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice catch!
nodedata.attributes["Full path"] = basePath + "/" + browsename; | ||
nodedata.dataTypeID = UA_TYPES_COUNT; | ||
UA_Variant* var = UA_Variant_new(); | ||
if(UA_Client_readValueAttribute(client_, ref->nodeId.nodeId, var) == UA_STATUSCODE_GOOD && var->type != NULL && var->data != NULL) { | ||
// Because the timestamps are eliminated in readValueAttribute for simplification |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If possible, we should only do this if we are in lazy mode, otherwise this is unnecessary.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Non-lazy does the same thing in the background, the 3rd party provides a simplified API function to hide this. (But swallows timestamps, that's why we can't use that here)
I don't mind having a bit more complex but single code path in case it has no performance drawbacks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this code part is a trimmed down version of UA_readValueAttribute
with a slight modification. Despite checking lazy mode before running might be better, I then have to pass the lazy flag from fetchopc processor to this function, which I am not quite into.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, LGTM!
Signed-off-by: Arpad Boda <aboda@apache.org> This closes apache#672
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi - MiNiFi C++.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:
For all changes:
Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
in the commit message?
Does your PR title start with MINIFICPP-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically master)?
Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit?
For code changes:
For documentation related changes:
Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.