Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-8120 Added RuntimeException handling on HttpContextMap.complete() #4747

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor

Description of PR

NIFI-8120 Adds RuntimeException handling for both invocations of HttpContextMap.complete() in HandleHttpResponse Processor. PR #1567 for NIFI-3517 introduced calling HttpContextMap.complete() when HandleHttpResponse failed to send Flow File contents to the HTTP output stream. In cases where the HTTP client has disconnected, however, HttpContextMap.complete() can throw an IllegalStateException, wrapping a java.nio.channels.ClosedChannelException when attempting to close the server connection. This change includes updated unit tests to confirm that Flow Files will be routed to failure when this situation occurs.

In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically main)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not squash or use --force when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes.

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

@@ -204,7 +206,7 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session

try {
contextMap.complete(contextIdentifier);
} catch (final IllegalStateException ise) {
} catch (final RuntimeException ise) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ise seems to be a leftover from the previous version.
Could you please use ce here too like in line 197.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Renamed to ce as requested.

@@ -194,7 +192,11 @@ public void onTrigger(final ProcessContext context, final ProcessSession session
} catch (final ProcessException e) {
session.transfer(flowFile, REL_FAILURE);
getLogger().error("Failed to respond to HTTP request for {} due to {}", new Object[]{flowFile, e});
contextMap.complete(contextIdentifier);
try {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not a new issue but it could be improved around exception handling:
The typical (by convention) error handling flow is logging first, then sending the FF to FAILURE (in case of an exception in session.transfer()). Like in the last catch block at lines 210-211.

This catch and the others throughout onTrigger() do it vice versa.
I would consider moving the
session.transfer(flowFile, REL_FAILURE);
lines just before the return statements.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That makes sense, reordered this and other session.transfer() calls to occur after logging.

@exceptionfactory
Copy link
Contributor Author

@turcsanyip Thanks for the review and detailed feedback. I pushed an update incorporating your recommendations.

Copy link
Contributor

@turcsanyip turcsanyip left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 LGTM
Merging to main.

@exceptionfactory Thanks for improving the exception handling of this processor and also for the test refactoring / clean-up.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in a4027e8 Jan 8, 2021
driesva pushed a commit to driesva/nifi that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2021
NIFI-8120 Renamed exception variable and reordered log statements

This closes apache#4747.

Signed-off-by: Peter Turcsanyi <turcsanyi@apache.org>
krisztina-zsihovszki pushed a commit to krisztina-zsihovszki/nifi that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2022
NIFI-8120 Renamed exception variable and reordered log statements

This closes apache#4747.

Signed-off-by: Peter Turcsanyi <turcsanyi@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants