Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary… #4913

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

NIFI-8300 Make non-source processors invalid if scheduled for Primary… #4913

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

s9514171
Copy link
Contributor

… Node only

Description of PR

Set the processor state to invalid, when the processor has upstream connection and set to "Primary node only"

For all changes:

  • Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
    in the commit message?

  • Does your PR title start with NIFI-XXXX where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.

  • Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically main)?

  • Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not squash or use --force when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes.

For code changes:

  • Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install at the root nifi folder?
  • Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
  • Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
  • If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under ASF 2.0?
  • If applicable, have you updated the LICENSE file, including the main LICENSE file under nifi-assembly?
  • If applicable, have you updated the NOTICE file, including the main NOTICE file found under nifi-assembly?
  • If adding new Properties, have you added .displayName in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?

For documentation related changes:

  • Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?

Note:

Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.

Copy link
Contributor

@markap14 markap14 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the improvement @s9514171 ! I left a couple of comments inline, as I think we can simplify things a bit and provide a more helpful validation message. Otherwise, all looks good to me.

Comment on lines 1095 to 1097
if (getExecutionNode() == ExecutionNode.PRIMARY) {
if (getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED
|| getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_ALLOWED && !getIncomingConnections().isEmpty()) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this can be simplified to just: if (getExecutionNode() == ExecutionNode.PRIMARY && hasIncomingConnection()) {

if (getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_REQUIRED
|| getInputRequirement() == Requirement.INPUT_ALLOWED && !getIncomingConnections().isEmpty()) {
results.add(new ValidationResult.Builder()
.explanation("Processor should set to run on all nodes.")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably need to provide more details in the explanation. Why should the processor be set to run on all nodes? Perhaps something to the effect of "Processors with incoming connections cannot be scheduled for Primary Node Only."

@s9514171
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your review @markap14 , it looks better now

@markap14 markap14 closed this in fedeafb Mar 19, 2021
@markap14
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @s9514171 ! Looks good to me too. +1 merged to main!

krisztina-zsihovszki pushed a commit to krisztina-zsihovszki/nifi that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2022
… Node only

This closes apache#4913.

Signed-off-by: Mark Payne <markap14@hotmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants