Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NIFI-12693: Moved notification of python process that a Processor was… #8315

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

markap14
Copy link
Contributor

… removed to a background (virtual) thread. Also noted in testing that in one instance a Python Processor never became

valid because it had cached property descriptors before the processor was fully initialized, so updated code to ensure that we do not cache values before initialization is completed.

Summary

NIFI-00000

Tracking

Please complete the following tracking steps prior to pull request creation.

Issue Tracking

Pull Request Tracking

  • Pull Request title starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, such as NIFI-00000
  • Pull Request commit message starts with Apache NiFi Jira issue number, as such NIFI-00000

Pull Request Formatting

  • Pull Request based on current revision of the main branch
  • Pull Request refers to a feature branch with one commit containing changes

Verification

Please indicate the verification steps performed prior to pull request creation.

Build

  • Build completed using mvn clean install -P contrib-check
    • JDK 21

Licensing

  • New dependencies are compatible with the Apache License 2.0 according to the License Policy
  • New dependencies are documented in applicable LICENSE and NOTICE files

Documentation

  • Documentation formatting appears as expected in rendered files

… removed to a background (virtual) thread. Also noted in testing that in one instance a Python Processor never became

valid because it had cached property descriptors before the processor was fully initialized, so updated code to ensure that we do not cache values before initialization is completed.
Copy link
Contributor

@exceptionfactory exceptionfactory left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @markap14, the adjustments to the relationship handling behavior look good. +1 merging

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants