Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"wsk activation poll" should put a timestamp on "Activation: action (id)" statement #22

Closed
l2fprod opened this issue Feb 25, 2016 · 4 comments
Labels

Comments

@l2fprod
Copy link
Contributor

l2fprod commented Feb 25, 2016

The "Activation:..." lines should have a timestamp like the others. Make it easier when debugging a log file to have everything formatted the same.

2016-02-23T15:28:02.015099357Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:28:13.826113391Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (48581ba45fac4119a5970250e3f0b0d7)
2016-02-23T15:28:14.837651635Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:28:18.889271119Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (e2e22077ad3945b48b612436fe0bb334)
2016-02-23T15:28:28.280158105Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:28:31.245863607Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (3b33904f79f448beb0c913856363a088)
2016-02-23T15:28:34.482853574Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:28:38.577133336Z stdout: [ 3666c679c084045f3ce8fd5366ee5a0d ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (0fa2dd0bb55f4df3ba68a571da1a6d34)
2016-02-23T15:51:12.976504553Z stdout: [ cd79105c27b8a96a34c9487de5ae3674 ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:51:17.293723081Z stdout: [ cd79105c27b8a96a34c9487de5ae3674 ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (21526c4dd7564090a9095941fa1d546b)
2016-02-23T15:51:29.006188995Z stdout: [ 3dfe009246a5be3eed46b476f527f22f ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T15:51:32.361084759Z stdout: [ 3dfe009246a5be3eed46b476f527f22f ] OK
Activation: vision-analysis (123fb4243552491b94b6fcf6a94be745)
2016-02-23T16:17:53.955350233Z stdout: [ 446a5e1a48171008b3faa34b3bd33d00 ] Processing image.jpg from document
2016-02-23T16:17:59.847872226Z stdout: [ 446a5e1a48171008b3faa34b3bd33d00 ] OK
@sjfink sjfink added the cli label Feb 25, 2016
@sjfink
Copy link
Contributor

sjfink commented Mar 6, 2016

@l2fprod : now that we agree that the Activation statements are used for grouping, do you still want this feature (timestamps on the group headers).?

I actually think having a different format is useful to help the human eye perceive the grouping.

@mbehrendt
Copy link

@sjfink can you pls send me a pointer describing what is meant by 'grouping'? independently from that, it feels like having a timestamp for activations is sth useful

@mbehrendt
Copy link

@sjfink pls ignore my comment above, just found the issue you're referring to is #21

@l2fprod
Copy link
Contributor Author

l2fprod commented Mar 7, 2016

@sjfink: given activation statements act as a separator I'd say I don't need the timestamp in this case.

@l2fprod l2fprod closed this as completed Mar 7, 2016
rabbah pushed a commit that referenced this issue Apr 9, 2019
This PR enables this repository with the functionality to move the
artifacts from the staging folder to the release folder.

Closes: #22
selfxp added a commit to selfxp/openwhisk that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2019
steffenrost added a commit to steffenrost/incubator-openwhisk that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2020
…base in Cloudant (apache#22)

* handle cloudant eventual consistency problems when create or delete a database

* check explicitly for left statuscode value

* check if string is included in reason

* additional print statement

* do not ignore failures on remove database
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants