Add consumer state check when request commands #772
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: xiaolongran <xiaolongran@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: xiaolongran <xiaolongran@tencent.com>
zymap
approved these changes
May 6, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Signed-off-by: xiaolongran xiaolongran@tencent.com
Motivation
At present, for different Command requests, when we request the Broker, some commands check the state of the current consumer, and some do not check the state of the current consumer.
If the consumer's state is closing or closed, in fact, we don't need to continue to request the broker, but should directly return the current request.
The current change checks all requests to the broker's command and adds a check on the consumer state.
Modifications
RequestOnCnxNoWaitfunc