Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources #7721

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Aug 5, 2020

Conversation

srkukarni
Copy link
Contributor

(If this PR fixes a github issue, please add Fixes #<xyz>.)

Fixes #

(or if this PR is one task of a github issue, please add Master Issue: #<xyz> to link to the master issue.)

Master Issue: #

Motivation

Currently when the framework creates producers for either the output topic or side topics, it is not possible to configure those producers. This pr adds that capability

Modifications

Describe the modifications you've done.

Verifying this change

  • Make sure that the change passes the CI checks.

(Please pick either of the following options)

This change is a trivial rework / code cleanup without any test coverage.

(or)

This change is already covered by existing tests, such as (please describe tests).

(or)

This change added tests and can be verified as follows:

(example:)

  • Added integration tests for end-to-end deployment with large payloads (10MB)
  • Extended integration test for recovery after broker failure

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

If yes was chosen, please highlight the changes

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (yes / no)
  • The public API: (yes / no)
  • The schema: (yes / no / don't know)
  • The default values of configurations: (yes / no)
  • The wire protocol: (yes / no)
  • The rest endpoints: (yes / no)
  • The admin cli options: (yes / no)
  • Anything that affects deployment: (yes / no / don't know)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (yes / no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable / docs / JavaDocs / not documented)
  • If a feature is not applicable for documentation, explain why?
  • If a feature is not documented yet in this PR, please create a followup issue for adding the documentation

@srkukarni srkukarni added this to the 2.7.0 milestone Aug 2, 2020
@srkukarni srkukarni self-assigned this Aug 2, 2020
Sanjeev Kulkarni added 2 commits August 2, 2020 10:56
@@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ public ContextImpl(InstanceConfig config, Logger logger, PulsarClient client,

this.producerBuilder = (ProducerBuilderImpl<?>) client.newProducer().blockIfQueueFull(true).enableBatching(true)
.batchingMaxPublishDelay(1, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
if (config.getFunctionDetails().getSink().getProducerSpec() != null) {
if (config.getFunctionDetails().getSink().getProducerSpec().getMaxPendingMessages() != 0) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since the variable is Integer, shouldn't we check for != null ?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are checking for null in getProducerSpec.
The getFunctionDetails is a protobuf and the variable that it returns is an integer. So null checking is not needed

@jerrypeng
Copy link
Contributor

@srkukarni you also need to set to producer configs for the producers in PulsarSink

@srkukarni
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jerrypeng done

import org.apache.pulsar.common.functions.FunctionConfig;
import org.apache.pulsar.common.functions.Resources;
import org.apache.pulsar.common.functions.WindowConfig;
import org.apache.pulsar.common.functions.*;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit lets not use wild cards. Makes debugging harder

@srkukarni srkukarni merged commit 22d7a6c into apache:master Aug 5, 2020
@srkukarni srkukarni deleted the producer_config branch August 5, 2020 01:35
jerrypeng pushed a commit to jerrypeng/incubator-pulsar that referenced this pull request Aug 14, 2020
…pache#7721)

* Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources

* Fixed test

* Fix test

* Add generated function proto

* Add header

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
huangdx0726 pushed a commit to huangdx0726/pulsar that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2020
…pache#7721)

* Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources

* Fixed test

* Fix test

* Add generated function proto

* Add header

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
lbenc135 pushed a commit to lbenc135/pulsar that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2020
…pache#7721)

* Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources

* Fixed test

* Fix test

* Add generated function proto

* Add header

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
lbenc135 pushed a commit to lbenc135/pulsar that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2020
…pache#7721)

* Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources

* Fixed test

* Fix test

* Add generated function proto

* Add header

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
lbenc135 pushed a commit to lbenc135/pulsar that referenced this pull request Sep 5, 2020
…pache#7721)

* Added ability to specify producer config for functions and sources

* Fixed test

* Fix test

* Add generated function proto

* Add header

* Address comments

Co-authored-by: Sanjeev Kulkarni <sanjeevk@splunk.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants