Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RIP-7] Support multi-directory storage in DLedger. #3914

Closed
2 tasks done
cserwen opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #4122
Closed
2 tasks done

[RIP-7] Support multi-directory storage in DLedger. #3914

cserwen opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 3 comments · Fixed by #4122

Comments

@cserwen
Copy link
Member

cserwen commented Mar 2, 2022

FEATURE REQUEST

  1. Please describe the feature you are requesting.
    Multi-directory storage has been supported in 4.9.2, but it only supports master-slave deployment mode. We should also support this feature in DLedger deployment mode.

  2. Provide any additional detail on your proposed use case for this feature.
    Refer to this pr RIP-7 Multiple Directories Storage Support #3357 to implement it.

  3. Indicate the importance of this issue to you (blocker, must-have, should-have, nice-to-have). Are you currently using any workarounds to address this issue?
    Should-have.

  4. If there are some sub-tasks using -[] for each subtask and create a corresponding issue to map to the sub task:

@cserwen
Copy link
Member Author

cserwen commented Mar 11, 2022

We can combine this feature with RIP-31, because if a server has 12 disks, it is impossible for us to deploy 12 brokers. We can use this feature to allocate a few disks to each broker, so that each node of a group can be utilized and It can also ensure that a broker has enough space to use. How do you think about it? @duhengforever @RongtongJin @Jason918

@Jason918
Copy link
Contributor

We can combine this feature with RIP-31, because if a server has 12 disks, it is impossible for us to deploy 12 brokers. We can use this feature to allocate a few disks to each broker, so that each node of a group can be utilized and It can also ensure that a broker has enough space to use.

This motivation LGTM.

@RongtongJin
Copy link
Contributor

Merged

GenerousMan pushed a commit to GenerousMan/rocketmq that referenced this issue Aug 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants