Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RIP-7] Multiple Directories Storage Support (#751) #3348

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

duhenglucky
Copy link
Contributor

@duhenglucky duhenglucky commented Sep 13, 2021

RIP-7:https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/wiki/RIP-7-Multiple-Directories-Storage-Support

More improvement PRs also need to be submitted to rip7_multi_directories branch, hope more developers will be involved in this RIP.

  • Update issue_template.md

  • Update README.md

  • RIP-7 Multiple Directories Storage Suppor

  • add readonly commit log paths

  • update

  • finish test

  • add test for testUpdatePathsOnline

  • bug fix

  • code format

* Update issue_template.md

* Update README.md

* RIP-7 Multiple Directories Storage Suppor

* add readonly commit log paths

* update

* finish test

* add test for testUpdatePathsOnline

* bug fix

* code format
@duhenglucky duhenglucky added this to the 5.0.0-preview milestone Sep 13, 2021
@vongosling vongosling added the progress/wip Work in progress. Accept or refused to be continue. label Sep 13, 2021
@duhenglucky
Copy link
Contributor Author

same with #3357

@cserwen
Copy link
Member

cserwen commented Feb 18, 2022

Can it be used in DLedger's deployment mode? @Jason918 @duhenglucky

@Jason918
Copy link
Contributor

Can it be used in DLedger's deployment mode? @Jason918 @duhenglucky

No, it's not supported in dledger.

@duhenglucky duhenglucky deleted the rip7_multi_directories branch March 23, 2022 02:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
progress/wip Work in progress. Accept or refused to be continue. type/rip
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants