Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SAMZA-1330: Stand alone feature preview, known limitation. #220

Closed
wants to merge 5 commits into from

Conversation

sborya
Copy link
Contributor

@sborya sborya commented Jun 8, 2017

No description provided.

* The LocalApplicationRunner does not yet support the low level API. This means you cannot use StreamTask with LocalApplicationRunner.
* Currently you can only run a single applicaiton with a single zookeeper.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought this limitation was only for LinkedIn. Can't we workaround this issue by using a unique job.id or app.id??

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, it still is a limitation. That's why it requires work around. Do you guys, want to add the workaround to the doc, or prefer remove it completely?

* The LocalApplicationRunner does not yet support the low level API. This means you cannot use StreamTask with LocalApplicationRunner.
* Currently, you can only run a single applicaiton with a single zookeeper. To avoid this limitation, you need to make sure your app.id is unique.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We can just say that the "app.id" must be unique for all applications using the zk cluster.
If not, typoe: "application" in the first line, and maybe say "single application at a time"

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yeah, this sounds simpler. Changed.

@asfgit asfgit closed this in ae29a40 Jun 12, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants