[SEDONA-473] Remove ucar from spark-shaded pom

[iGN5117]

Did you read the Contributor Guide?

• Yes, I have read Contributor Rules and Contributor Development Guide

Is this PR related to a JIRA ticket?

• Yes, the URL of the associated JIRA ticket is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SEDONA-473. The PR name follows the format [SEDONA-XXX] my subject.

What changes were proposed in this PR?

• Remove ucar from spark-shaded pom

How was this patch tested?

• Passed existing tests

Did this PR include necessary documentation updates?

• No, this PR does not affect any public API so no need to change the docs.

[Kontinuation]

This does not resolve SEDONA-473, since cdm-core is introduced by the parent POM, not the shaded POM. Actually the POM published to maven central for spark-shaded is a dependency-reduced POM, which does not have dependencies in compile scope (See https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sedona/sedona-spark-shaded-3.5_2.12/1.5.1/sedona-spark-shaded-3.5_2.12-1.5.1.pom).

The correct way to resolve this issue is to remove https://github.com/apache/sedona/blob/master/pom.xml#L132-L135 in the parent POM.

[iGN5117]

This does not resolve SEDONA-473, since cdm-core is introduced by the parent POM, not the shaded POM. Actually the POM published to maven central for spark-shaded is a dependency-reduced POM, which does not have dependencies in compile scope (See https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/sedona/sedona-spark-shaded-3.5_2.12/1.5.1/sedona-spark-shaded-3.5_2.12-1.5.1.pom).

The correct way to resolve this issue is to remove https://github.com/apache/sedona/blob/master/pom.xml#L132-L135 in the parent POM.

@Kontinuation thanks for checking this PR. I was confused if I would need to keep ucar in the parent pom to support NetCDF functionality, but even removing it makes no difference.
I've reverted my earlier commit and removed ucar from sedona/pom.xml now. Please approve if it looks good!

[Kontinuation]

@Kontinuation thanks for checking this PR. I was confused if I would need to keep ucar in the parent pom to support NetCDF functionality, but even removing it makes no difference. I've reverted my earlier commit and removed ucar from sedona/pom.xml now. Please approve if it looks good!

Now it should be good, but I prefer removing the unused dependency instead of commenting it out.

[iGN5117]

@Kontinuation thanks for checking this PR. I was confused if I would need to keep ucar in the parent pom to support NetCDF functionality, but even removing it makes no difference. I've reverted my earlier commit and removed ucar from sedona/pom.xml now. Please approve if it looks good!

Now it should be good, but I prefer removing the unused dependency instead of commenting it out.

Yes ofcourse, the comment was temporary. Removed it completely.