New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[SPARK-18667][PySpark][SQL] Change the way to group row in BatchEvalPythonExec so input_file_name function can work with UDF in pyspark #16115
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cc @davies |
Test build #69549 has started for PR 16115 at commit |
retest this please. |
…input_file_name in pyspark.
Test build #69553 has finished for PR 16115 at commit
|
viirya
force-pushed
the
fix-py-udf-input-filename
branch
from
December 2, 2016 10:16
7cd606b
to
8b0ef1e
Compare
Test build #69563 has finished for PR 16115 at commit
|
cc @cloud-fan @hvanhovell too |
ping @davies again |
asfgit
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 8, 2016
…ythonExec so input_file_name function can work with UDF in pyspark ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? `input_file_name` doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem: from pyspark.sql.functions import * from pyspark.sql.types import * def filename(path): return path sourceFile = udf(filename, StringType()) spark.read.json("tmp.json").select(sourceFile(input_file_name())).show() +---------------------------+ |filename(input_file_name())| +---------------------------+ | | +---------------------------+ The cause of this issue is, we group rows in `BatchEvalPythonExec` for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename. This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch. ## How was this patch tested? Added unit test to PySpark. Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request. Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com> Closes #16115 from viirya/fix-py-udf-input-filename. (cherry picked from commit 6a5a725) Signed-off-by: Wenchen Fan <wenchen@databricks.com>
good catch! Merging to master/2.1, thanks! |
robert3005
pushed a commit
to palantir/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2016
…ythonExec so input_file_name function can work with UDF in pyspark ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? `input_file_name` doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem: from pyspark.sql.functions import * from pyspark.sql.types import * def filename(path): return path sourceFile = udf(filename, StringType()) spark.read.json("tmp.json").select(sourceFile(input_file_name())).show() +---------------------------+ |filename(input_file_name())| +---------------------------+ | | +---------------------------+ The cause of this issue is, we group rows in `BatchEvalPythonExec` for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename. This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch. ## How was this patch tested? Added unit test to PySpark. Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request. Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com> Closes apache#16115 from viirya/fix-py-udf-input-filename.
uzadude
pushed a commit
to uzadude/spark
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 27, 2017
…ythonExec so input_file_name function can work with UDF in pyspark ## What changes were proposed in this pull request? `input_file_name` doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem: from pyspark.sql.functions import * from pyspark.sql.types import * def filename(path): return path sourceFile = udf(filename, StringType()) spark.read.json("tmp.json").select(sourceFile(input_file_name())).show() +---------------------------+ |filename(input_file_name())| +---------------------------+ | | +---------------------------+ The cause of this issue is, we group rows in `BatchEvalPythonExec` for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename. This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch. ## How was this patch tested? Added unit test to PySpark. Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request. Author: Liang-Chi Hsieh <viirya@gmail.com> Closes apache#16115 from viirya/fix-py-udf-input-filename.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
input_file_name
doesn't return filename when working with UDF in PySpark. An example shows the problem:The cause of this issue is, we group rows in
BatchEvalPythonExec
for batching processing of PythonUDF. Currently we group rows first and then evaluate expressions on the rows. If the data is less than the required number of rows for a group, the iterator will be consumed to the end before the evaluation. However, once the iterator reaches the end, we will unset input filename. So the input_file_name expression can't return correct filename.This patch fixes the approach to group the batch of rows. We evaluate the expression first and then group evaluated results to batch.
How was this patch tested?
Added unit test to PySpark.
Please review http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html before opening a pull request.