Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-23901][SQL] Add masking functions #21246

Closed
wants to merge 11 commits into from
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
/*
* Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
* contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
* this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
* The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
* (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
* the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/

package org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions;

/**
* Contains all the Utils methods used in the masking expressions.
*/
public class MaskExpressionsUtils {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is this implemented in Java?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Because I am invoking also in the Java code generated and I wanted to avoid using the match clause (instead of the switch java operation) for performance reasons.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see, thanks!

final static int UNMASKED_VAL = -1;

/**
* Returns the masking character for {@param c} or {@param c} is it should not be masked.
* @param c the character to transform
* @param maskedUpperChar the character to use instead of a uppercase letter
* @param maskedLowerChar the character to use instead of a lowercase letter
* @param maskedDigitChar the character to use instead of a digit
* @param maskedOtherChar the character to use instead of a any other character
* @return masking character for {@param c}
*/
public static int transformChar(
final int c,
int maskedUpperChar,
int maskedLowerChar,
int maskedDigitChar,
int maskedOtherChar) {
switch(Character.getType(c)) {
case Character.UPPERCASE_LETTER:
if(maskedUpperChar != UNMASKED_VAL) {
return maskedUpperChar;
}
break;

case Character.LOWERCASE_LETTER:
if(maskedLowerChar != UNMASKED_VAL) {
return maskedLowerChar;
}
break;

case Character.DECIMAL_DIGIT_NUMBER:
if(maskedDigitChar != UNMASKED_VAL) {
return maskedDigitChar;
}
break;

default:
if(maskedOtherChar != UNMASKED_VAL) {
return maskedOtherChar;
}
break;
}

return c;
}

/**
* Returns the replacement char to use according to the {@param rep} specified by the user and
* the {@param def} default.
*/
public static int getReplacementChar(String rep, int def) {
if (rep != null && rep.length() > 0) {
return rep.codePointAt(0);
}
return def;
}
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -429,6 +429,14 @@ object FunctionRegistry {
expression[Flatten]("flatten"),
CreateStruct.registryEntry,

// mask functions
expression[Mask]("mask"),
expression[MaskFirstN]("mask_first_n"),
expression[MaskLastN]("mask_last_n"),
expression[MaskShowFirstN]("mask_show_first_n"),
expression[MaskShowLastN]("mask_show_last_n"),
expression[MaskHash]("mask_hash"),

// misc functions
expression[AssertTrue]("assert_true"),
expression[Crc32]("crc32"),
Expand Down
Loading