Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SPARK-32779][SQL][Follow-up] Delete Unused code #29736

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sandeep-katta
Copy link
Contributor

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Follow-up PR as per the review comments in 29649

Why are the changes needed?

Delete the un used code

Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?

No

How was this patch tested?

Existing UT

…Catalog in withClient flow, this leads to DeadLock
@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 12, 2020

Test build #128589 has finished for PR 29736 at commit 8e4e06c.

  • This patch fails due to an unknown error code, -9.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@sandeep-katta sandeep-katta changed the title [SPARK-32779][SQL][Follow-up] Avoid using synchronized API of Catalog in withClient flow, this leads to DeadLock [SPARK-32779][SQL][Follow-up] Delete Unused code Sep 12, 2020
@sandeep-katta
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this please

@SparkQA
Copy link

SparkQA commented Sep 12, 2020

Test build #128591 has finished for PR 29736 at commit 8e4e06c.

  • This patch passes all tests.
  • This patch merges cleanly.
  • This patch adds no public classes.

@HyukjinKwon
Copy link
Member

cc @dongjoon-hyun fyi

Copy link
Member

@dongjoon-hyun dongjoon-hyun left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1, LGTM. Merged to master/3.0.
Thank you, @sandeep-katta and @HyukjinKwon .

dongjoon-hyun pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow-up PR as per the review comments in [29649](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29649/files/8d45542e915bea1b321f42988b407091065a2539#r487140171)

### Why are the changes needed?
Delete the un used code

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT

Closes #29736 from sandeep-katta/deadlockfollowup.

Authored-by: sandeep.katta <sandeep.katta2007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2009f95)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
holdenk pushed a commit to holdenk/spark that referenced this pull request Oct 27, 2020
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Follow-up PR as per the review comments in [29649](https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/29649/files/8d45542e915bea1b321f42988b407091065a2539#r487140171)

### Why are the changes needed?
Delete the un used code

### Does this PR introduce _any_ user-facing change?
No

### How was this patch tested?
Existing UT

Closes apache#29736 from sandeep-katta/deadlockfollowup.

Authored-by: sandeep.katta <sandeep.katta2007@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
(cherry picked from commit 2009f95)
Signed-off-by: Dongjoon Hyun <dongjoon@apache.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
4 participants